Governing failure: politics, heroin, families

References 

1. Asche J. The Family Court—the first 10 years. Australian Family Lawyer. 1986;2(2):1–6
2. Australia (1959). House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).
3. Australia (1970). House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).
4. Australia (1971). House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).
5. Australia (1973). House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).
6. Bammer G. When science meets politics: the Australian heroin trial feasibility study. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1996;7(1):46–51
7. Barwick G. Some aspects of the new Matrimonial Causes Act. Sydney Law Review. 1961;3(3):409–438
8. Beauvais F. The politicising of science: when ‘protection’ of subjects' rights leads to a wrong. Substance Use and Misuse. 1997;32(1):77–82
9. Brereton D. The history and politics of prohibition. In:  Strokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;
10. Brook H. The conjugal body politic: marriage and the (post-) modern girl. In:  Crowder G,  Manning H,  Mathieson DS,  Parkin A,  Seabrooke L editor. Australasian Political Studies 1997. 1:Adelaide: Flinders University of South Australia; 1997;
11. Brook H. How to do things with sex. In:  Stychin C,  Herman D editor. Sexuality in the Legal Arena. London: Athlone Press; 2000;
12. Broome J. Impacts upon social and political life. In:  Stokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;
13. In:  Burke J editors. Jowitt's Dictionary of English Law. 2nd ed.. London: Sweet and Maxwell Ltd; 1977;
14. Bush B, Neutze M. In search of what is right: the moral dimensions of the drug debate. Australian Journal of Social Issues. 2000;35(2):129–144
15. Calwell, A. (1959). Parliamentary speech, Matrimonial Causes Bill, 12 November 1959, in Australia, House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates 2694–2699 (Member for Melbourne).
16. Cohen J. Drug education: politics, propaganda and censorship. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1996;7(3):153–157
17. Copello A, Orford J, Velleman R, Templeton L, Krishnan M. Methods for reducing alcohol and drug related family harm in non-specialist settings. Journal of Mental Health. 2000;9(3):329–343
18. Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule In Modern Society. London: Sage; 1999;
19. In:  Dean M,  Hindess B editor. Governing Australia: Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998;
20. Duthie, G. (1959). Parliamentary speech, Matrimonial Causes Bill, 17 November 1959, in Australia, House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates 2735–2740 (Member for Wilmot).
21. Elliott AJ, Chapman S. ‘Heroin hell their own making’: construction of heroin users in the Australian press 1992–97. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2000;19:191–201
    • CrossRef
22. Farr, M. (1997). Cold turkey PM shoots down heroin trial. Daily Telegraph, 20 August 1997:1.
23. Finlay H. The grounds for divorce: the Australian experience. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 1986;6(368):370–378
24. Finlay HA, Bailey-Harris RJ. Family Law in Australia. 4th ed.. Sydney: Butterworths; 1989;
25. Foucault M. Governmentality. In:  Burchell G,  Gordon C,  Miller P editor. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1991;
26. Garland D. ‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime. In:  Smandych R editors. Governable Places: Readings on Governmentality and Crime Control. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Dartmouth; 1999;
27. Hannan, E. (2000). How politics killed drug rooms. The Age, 27 May 2000 (Editorial).
28. McConnell B. Families and friends raising awareness and reducing harm. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1997;9:153–157
29. Makkai T, McAllister I. Public Opinion Towards Drug Policies in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services; 1998;
30. Manderson D. From Mr Sin to Mr Big: A History of Australian Drug Laws. Melbourne: Oxford University Press; 1993;
31. Manderson D. An archaeology of drug laws. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1994;5(4):235–245
32. Merikangas KR. Familial transmission of substance use disorders. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1999;281(5):402
33. Mugford SK. Drug policy and harm reduction: towards a unified policy for legal and illegal drugs. In:  Carne T,  Drew L,  Mathews J,  Mugford SK,  Wodak A editor. An Unwinnable War: The Politics of Drug Decriminalisation. Sydney: Pluto Press; 1991;
34. Mugford S. Harm reduction: does it lead where its proponents imagine?. In:  Heather N,  Wodak A,  Nadelman EA,  Hare POP editor. Psychoactive Drugs and Harm Reduction: From Faith to Science. London: Whurr Publishers; 1998;
35. O'Malley P. Consuming risks: harm minimization and the government of ‘drug-users’. In:  Smandych R editors. Governable Places. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Dartmouth; 1999;
36. Orford J, Natera G, Davies J, Nava A, Mora J, Rigby K, et al. Tolerate, engage or withdraw: a study of the structure of families coping with alcohol and drug problems in south west England and Mexico City. Addiction. 1998;93(12):1799–1813
    • MEDLINE
37. Parker S, Parkinson P, Behrens J. Australian Family Law in Context: Commentary and Materials. Sydney: The Law Book Company; 1994;
38. Parkin A. Balancing individual rights and community norms. In:  Stokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;
39. Rohl T. Evaluating the national drug strategy. In:  Stokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;
40. Rose N. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London and New York: Routledge; 1991;
41. Rose N. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1999;
42. Scutt J. Women and the Law: Commentary and Materials. Sydney: The Law Book Company; 1990;
43. Short, J., Hawes, R., & Kerin, J. (1997). Heroin trials not on says Howard. The Australian, 20 August 1997:1.
44. Snyder, A. (1999). Game, mind and match. The Weekend Australian, 4/5 December 1999:30.
45. Spooner C. Causes and correlates of adolescent drug abuse and implications for treatment. Drug and Alcohol Review. 1999;18:453–475
    • CrossRef
46. Stewart, F. (1959). Parliamentary speech, Matrimonial Causes Bill, 12 November 1959, in Australia, House of Representatives. Parliamentary Debates 1959:2707–2711 (Member for Lang).
47. In:  Stokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;
48. Totaro, P. (2000). Drug campaign not hard line enough for PM. Sydney Morning Herald, 7 July 2000.
49. Valverde M. Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998;
50. Wild TC, Newton-Taylor B, Ogborne AC, Mann R, Erickson P, MacDonald S. Attitudes toward compulsory substance abuse treatment: a comparison of the public, counsellors, probationers and judges' views. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy. 2001;8(1):33–45
51. Wodak A. Public health and politics: the demise of the ACT heroin trial. Medical Journal of Australia. 1997;167:348–349
52. Wodak A. Developing more effective responses. In:  Stokes G,  Chalk P,  Gillen K editor. Drugs and Democracy: In Search of New Directions. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press; 2000;