CommentaryAnthropology and epidemiology on drugs: the challenges of cross-methodological and theoretical dialogue
Introduction
The absence of a dialogue between epidemiological and qualitative researchers—especially ethnographers who engage in cultural anthropology's version of participant-observation methods—is a failure from the perspectives of both the pragmatic positivism of public health and also the critical theory of anthropology. From the vantage point of rational scientific endeavour it is surprising that most epidemiologists and biostatisticians do not introduce a minor ethnographic component to their research projects in order to improve the precision of the data they collect or to augment the clarity of their analysis. One would think that training programs in epidemiological methods in schools of public health and medicine would want to expose students and faculty to a minimal dose of qualitative techniques—even if only to improve the language, logic and triangulation capacities of their questionnaires.
Of course, the converse is also true: it is surprising that most anthropologists know nothing about the quantitative methods to which they are often hostile. They do not recognise how useful it can be to consult already-existing, easily accessible quantitative databases that might allow them to situate their research subject with little effort and no expense. One would also think that training programs in ethnographic methods in departments of anthropology would require students and faculty to acquire minimal competence in quantitative techniques—even if only to gauge statistical significance and to locate basic demographic datasets on the web.
Section snippets
Power/knowledge and disciplinary boundaries
As an ethnographer who engages in the participant-observation methods that have been developed in the discipline of cultural anthropology over the past century, I have always been impressed by how deeply epidemiologists care about the precision of their data in contrast to ethnographers. Anthropology is premised on the cultural contingency of reality. Facts are treated as cultural constructions. Furthermore, the advent of postmodern theory in US anthropology during the mid-1980s has
Crunching numbers in a vacuum
Public health journals aggressively enforce the quantitative/qualitative divide by almost exclusively publishing quantitatively-based research. They subject the statistical data of the manuscripts they receive to rigorous mathematical peer review. They fail, however, to request authors to provide even the simplest qualitative, contextual information to explain how the data were collected or how the samples were structured. Aside from standardised slogans such as “with informed consent;”
Failed magic bullets: needle exchange, bleach, methadone and condoms
A polemic erupted in the 1990s around the pros and cons of needle exchange programs: Do they protect from HIV or spread HIV? This prominent harm reduction debate was waged almost exclusively on the basis of statistical re-analyses of published data presented in public health journals (see, for example, special issues of the American Journal of Epidemiology, 1999, American Journal of Public Health, 2000). Even a superficial qualitative analysis of the half dozen needle exchange studies that are
The surprises of heroin maintenance
My visits to heroin injection clinics in Geneva (not real participant-observation ethnography by any definition) suggest that heroin prescription stabilises most long-term heroin addicts, with the exception of some cocaine injectors. The most surprising preliminary ethnographic finding from the Swiss Diversified Opiate Prescription Program, is that a significant sub-group of the addicts complain that the pharmacological grade heroin prescribed to them is ‘bunk.’ This was further corroborated in
Gender power relations and HCV seroconversion
Qualitative methods are not superior to quantitative methods. It would be impossible to know much of anything of importance in the field of public health without following the dictum of the founder of epidemiology quoted in the epigram: “… weigh life for life and where the dead lie thicker… (Virchow, 1848, cited in Farmer, 1999).” I am currently collaborating with Andrew Moss's UFO [author: in full] project which is an epidemiological cohort study documenting HCV seroincidence among youth
The theoretical politics of epidemiology
Over the past century and a half of rapid urbanisation and industrialisation, epidemiology has a better record than ethnography with respect to critiquing the social structural power relations that make the socially vulnerable suffer. Arguably, the field of epidemiology was founded as a radical social critique of inequality and injustice under capitalism. Virchow (cited in the epigraph) unabashedly proclaimed his political humanitarian purpose for counting the sick and dying, “… to see where
The symbolic violence of HCV prevention
Hepatitis C is a particularly problematic virus because no magic bullet solution prevents its spread. At a 40% per year seroconversion rate among young homeless women in San Francisco it becomes almost impossible for street injecting youth to escape HCV infection unless they are anti-social outcasts. It is useless to tell young injectors “Never share cookers, cottons or rinse water” when they are living in a city where the heroin consists of black tar requiring it to be put into solution in
Postmodern tolerance
In the name of straightforward positivism as well as intellectual and political logic, quantitative drug researchers have to be the ones to reach out to their qualitative brothers and sisters. In the field of public health, epidemiologists hold the institutional power and set the agenda. Qualitative researchers usually cannot garner significant sources of research funding. They are excluded from publishing in the field's prestigious journals. Qualitative researchers can be frustratingly slow to
Acknowledgements
Written with the support of National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) grant R01-DA10164 and the Trustees’ Grant-in-Aid program of the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. Comparative data were also drawn from related NIDA-supported projects: R01 DA12803-01, R01 DA1159, NO1DA-3-5201, PSC 263-MD-519210, R01 DA10164R99-57-115 and the University of California's Universitywide AIDS Research Program R99-SF-052. Four and a half years of participant-observation fieldwork in East Harlem
References (42)
- et al.
Evaluating effectiveness of syringe exchange programmes: current issues and future prospects
Social Science and Medicine
(2000) - et al.
HIV, bleach, and needle sharing
Lancet
(1987) - et al.
Hepatitis c virus infection and needle exchange use among young injection drug users in San Francisco
Hepatology
(2001) - et al.
Sexual transmission of HIV-1 among injection drug users in San Francisco, USA: risk-factor analysis
Lancet
(2001) Epidemiology and the web of causation—has anyone seen the spider
Social Science and Medicine
(1994)- et al.
Can hiv-1-contaminated syringes be disinfected?: Implications for transmission among injection drug users
Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
(2001) - American Journal of Epidemiology (1999). Special Issue of American Journal of Epidemiology,...
- American Journal of Public Health (2000). Special Issue of American Journal of Public Health,...
Eichmann in Jerusalem; a report on the banality of evil
(1963)Becoming a marijuana user
American Journal of Sociology
(1953)
Masculine domination
The moral economies of homeless heroin addicts: Confronting ethnography, HIV risk, and everyday violence in San Francisco shooting encampments [see comments]
Substance Use and Misuse
Disciplining addictions: the bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States
Culture Medicine and Psychiatry
Needle exchange, HIV infection, and the politics of science: Confronting Canada's cocaine injection epidemic with participant observation
Medical Anthropology
High rates of HIV infection among injection drug users participating in needle exchange programs in Montreal: results of a cohort study [see comments]
American Journal of Epidemiology
Effects of varying concentrations of bleach on in vitro hiv-1 replication and the relevance to injection drug use
Intervirology
A Dutch treat: randomized controlled experimentation and the case of heroin maintenance in the Netherlands
History of the Human Sciences
HIV/Aids prevention for drug users in natural settings
Heroin addiction—a metabolic disease
Archives of Internal Medicine
Cited by (113)
‘Not just one box that you tick off’ – Deconstructing the hepatitis C care cascade in the interferon-free direct acting antiviral era from the client perspective
2022, International Journal of Drug Policy“I couldn't live with killing one of my friends or anybody”: A rapid ethnographic study of drug sellers’ use of drug checking
2021, International Journal of Drug PolicyMaking sense of ‘side effects’: Counterpublic health in the era of direct-acting antivirals
2019, International Journal of Drug PolicyA ‘promising tool’? A critical review of the social and ethico-political effects of wastewater analysis in the context of illicit drug epidemiology and drug policy
2019, Current Opinion in Environmental Science and HealthAyahuasca's entwined efficacy: An ethnographic study of ritual healing from ‘addiction’
2017, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :Yet, as social theories of addiction have shown, addiction is a complex, enmeshed and biosocial process (Garriott & Raikhel, 2015). There are many addictions (Bourgois, 2002; Campbell & Lovell, 2012; Netherland & Hansen, 2016). In our ethnography, which took place entirely outside of specialized addiction treatment centres, we seldom encountered the term ‘addiction’.
Moral ambivalence and the decision to initiate others into injection drug use: A qualitative study in two California cities
2016, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :The term moral economy was originally employed by E.P Thompson to examine how certain groups establish consensus about what are legitimate and illegitimate practices (Thompson, 1971). In recent years, the notion of a moral economy among inner-city drug users has been used to understand how minimal resources and a social expectation of sharing drugs can lead to risk-taking by sharing of injection paraphernalia such as syringes, cookers, and cottons (Bourgois, 1998b, 2002; Bourgois, Prince, & Moss, 2004; Zule, 1992). Understanding the nuances of the moral economy elucidates the ways that social norms and acceptable practices are established among street-based PWID.