International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 431-435, December 2003

Public opinion about syringe exchange programmes in the USA: an analysis of national surveys

  • Jon S. Vernick

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-410-955-7982.
    • ,
  • Scott Burris

      Affiliations

    • Center for Law and the Public’s Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    • Temple University Beasley School of Law, 1719 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
    • ,
  • Steffanie A. Strathdee

      Affiliations

    • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Received 1 December 2002; received in revised form 2 July 2003; accepted 4 July 2003.

Abstract 

Background: Despite scientific evidence demonstrating their effectiveness, syringe exchange programs (SEPs) have not been as widely embraced by policy-makers in the USA as in some other nations. One reason for this disjunction between science and policy may be the effect of public opinion.

Methods: To better understand the role of public opinion in shaping SEP policies, we undertook a systematic search for all reported U.S. national surveys asking about support or opposition to SEPs. Relevant polls were identified through a national database of public opinion questions, and a similar search of a newspaper database. We present the survey findings. The wording of poll questions and the agenda of organisations sponsoring the polls are also examined.

Results: Twenty-one questions from 14 different polls conducted from 1987 to 2000 were identified. Support for SEPs ranged from 29 to 66%. Surveys conducted by organisations with a public health agenda were more likely to suggest support for SEPs than those sponsored by organisations with a “family values” perspective. Question wording appeared to strongly influence support for SEPs. Poll questions that referred to “drug addicts” were less likely to indicate majority support for SEPs than those that avoided loaded terms or that provided public health information to respondents.

Discussion: Public opinion regarding SEPs is very malleable, strongly affected by question wording or other biases of organisations sponsoring the polls. Therefore, there may be no clear national consensus on the desirability of SEPs. Our findings are particularly relevant for national policy, such as federal funding for SEPs.

Keywords:  Syringe, Needle exchange, Survey, HIV/AIDS, Injection drug users

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0955-3959(03)00144-0

doi:10.1016/S0955-3959(03)00144-0

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 431-435, December 2003

Article Tools