International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 267-274 , August 2005

Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States

  • Leo Beletsky

      Affiliations

    • Brown Medical School, Providence, RI, USA
    • Temple University Beasley School of Law, The Centre for Law and The Public's Health at Georgetown, Johns Hopkins Universities, 1719 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence at: P.O. Box 644, New York, NY 10276, USA. Tel.: +1 917 330 6553; fax: +1 305 861 1046.
  • ,
  • Grace E. Macalino

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts New England Medical Centre (NEMC), 750 Washington St. # 63, Boston, MA 02111, USA
    • Tel.: +1 617 636 6276.
  • ,
  • Scott Burris

      Affiliations

    • Temple University Beasley School of Law, The Centre for Law and The Public's Health at Georgetown, Johns Hopkins Universities, 1719 N. Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
    • Tel.: +1 215 204 6576; fax: 1 215 204 1185.

Received 22 September 2004 ,Revised 16 January 2005 ,Accepted 18 January 2005.

References 

  1. Addison RB. A grounded hermeneutic editing approach. In:  Crabtree BF,  Miller WL editor. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999;
  2. Aitken C, Moore D, Higgs P, Kelsall J, Kerger M. The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: Evidence from the street. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2002;13:189–198
  3. Aral SO, Shearing C, Burris S. Health and the governance of security: A tale of two systems. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2002;30(4):632–643
  4. Beyer L, Crofts N, Reid G. Drug offending and criminal justice responses: Practitioners’ perspectives. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2002;13:203–211
  5. Blankenship KM, Koester S. Criminal law, policing policy, and HIV risk in female street sex workers and injection drug users. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2002;30:548–559
  6. Bloodborne Pathogens. (2004). Code of Federal Regulations. Title 29 1910.1030.
  7. Bluthenthal RN. Impact of law enforcement on syringe exchange programs: A look at Oakland and San Francisco. Medical Anthropology. 1997;18(1):61–83
  8. Bluthenthal RN, Kral AH, Erringer EA, Edlin BR. Drug paraphernalia laws and injection-related infections disease risk among drug injectors. Journal of Drug Issues. 1999;29(1):1–16
  9. Bluthenthal RN, Lorvick J, Kral AH, Erringer EA, Kahn JG. Collateral damage in the war on drugs: HIV risk behaviours among injection drug users. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 1999;10:25–38
  10. Broadhead RS. The impact of a needle exchange's closure. Public Health Reports. 1999;114(5):439–447
  11. Burris, S. (in press). From security to health. In J. Woods & B. Dupont (Eds.), Democracy and the governance of security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Burris S, Blankenship KM, Donoghoe M, Sherman S, Vernick JS, Case P, et al. Addressing the “risk environment” for injection drug users: The mysterious case of the missing cop. Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82:125–156
  13. Burris S, Finucane D, Gallagher H, Grace J. The legal strategies used in operating syringe exchange programs in the United States. American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86(8 Pt 1):1161–1166
  14. Burris S, Strathdee S, Vernick J. Lethal injections: The law, science and politics of syringe access for injection drug users. University of San Francisco Law Review. 2003;37:813–883
  15. Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (1988). Update: Universal precautions for prevention of transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, and other bloodborne pathogens in health-care settings. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), 37, 377–382, 387–378.
  16. Collins C, Summers T, Aragon R, Johnson SB. Syringe exchange and AB 136: The dynamics of local consideration in 6 California communities. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2002;
  17. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999;
  18. Davis, C., Burris, S., Metzger, D., Becher, J., & Lynch, K. (2005). Effects of an intensive street-level police intervention on syringe exchange program utilization: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. American Journal of Public Health.
  19. Des Jarlais DC, McKnight C, Milliken J. Public funding of US syringe exchange programs. Journal of Urban Health. 2004;81(1):118–121
  20. Doe v. Bridgeport Police Department. (2001). 198 F.R.D. 325 (US Dist).
  21. Gleghorn AA, Jones TS, Dogherty MC, Celentano DD, Vlahov D. Acquisition and use of needles and syringes by injecting drug users in Baltimore, MD. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 1995;10:97–103
  22. Gollub EL. Human rights is a US problem too: The case of women and HIV. American Journal of Public Health. 1999;89:1479–1482
  23. Groseclose SL, Weinstein B, Jones TS, Valleroy LA, Fehrs LJ, Kassler WJ. Impact of increased legal access to needles and syringes on practices of injecting-drug users and police officers—Connecticut, 1992–1993. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes & Human Retrovirology. 1995;10(1):82–89
  24. Grund JPC. A candle lit from both ends: The epidemic of HIV infection in central and Eastern Europe. In:  McElrath K editors. HIV and AIDS: International perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 2001;p. 41–67
  25. Grund JPC, Hechathorn DD, Broadhead RS, Anthnony DL. In Eastern Connecticut, IDUs purchase syringes from pharmacies but don’t carry syringes [letter]. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology. 1995;10:104–105
  26. Human Rights Watch. (2003a). Abusing the user: Police misconduct, harm reduction and HIV/AIDS in Vancouver. Human Rights Watch, New York, 15(2(B)).
  27. Human Rights Watch. (2003b). Injecting reason: Human rights and HIV prevention for injection drug users. Human Rights Watch, New York, 15(2(G)).
  28. Human Rights Watch. (2003c). Fanning the flames: How human rights abuses are fueling the AIDS epidemic in Kazakhstan. Human Rights Watch, New York, 15(3(D)).
  29. Hurley SF, Jolley DJ, Kaldor JM. Effectiveness of needle-exchange programmes for prevention of HIV infection. Lancet. 1997;349:1797–1800
  30. Klein H, Levy J. Shooting gallery users and HIV risk. Journal of Drug Issues. 2003;22(3):751–768
  31. Koester S. Copping, running and paraphernalia laws: Contextual variables and needle risk behaviour among injection drug users in Denver. Human Organization. 1994;51(3):287–295
  32. Lin PFZ, Yang F, Wu ZY, Wang Y, Liu YY, Ming ZQ, et al. Evaluation of a pilot study on needle and syringe exchange program among injecting drug users in a community in Guangdong, China. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004;38(5):305–308
  33. Lorentz J, Hill L, Samimi B. Occupational needlestick injuries in a metropolitan police force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2000;18:146–150
  34. MacDonald M, Law M, Kaldor J, Hales J, Dore G. Effectiveness of needle and syringe programmes for preventing HIV. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2003;14(5/6):353–358
  35. Maher L, Dixon D. Policing and public health: Law enforcement and harm minimization in a street-level drug markets. British Journal of Criminology. 1999;34(4):488–511
  36. Midford R, Acres J, Lenton S, Loxley W, Boots K. Cops, drugs and the community: Establishing consultative harm reduction structures in two Western Australian locations. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2002;13:181–188
  37. MSIC Evaluation Committee. (2003). Final report of the evaluation of the Sydney medically supervised injection centre. Sydney: MSIC Evaluation Committee.
  38. Normand J, Vlahov D, Moses LE. In:  Normand J,  Vlahov D,  Moses LE editor. Preventing HIV transmission: The role of sterile syringes and bleach. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1995;
  39. Raboud JM, Boily MC, Rajeswaran J, O'Shaughnessy MV, Schechter MT. The impact of needle-exchange programs on the spread of HIV among injection drug users: A simulation study. Journal of Urban Health. 2003;80(2):302–320
  40. Rhodes T, Mikhailova L, Sarang A, Rylkov A, Lowndes C, Khutorskoy M, et al. Situational factors influencing drug injecting, risk reduction and syringe exchange in Togliatti City, Russian Federation: A qualitative study of micro risk environment. Social Science and Medicine. 2002;57:39–54
  41. Rhodes T, Stimson GV, Crofts N, Ball A, Dehne K, Khodakevich L. Drug injecting, rapid HIV spread, and the ‘risk environment’: Implications for assessment and response. AIDS. 1999;13(Suppl. A):S259–S269
  42. Rich J, Dickinson B, Liu K, Case P, Jesdale B, Ingegneri R, et al. Strict syringe laws in Rhode Island are associated with high rates of reusing syringes and HIV risks among injection drug users. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 1998;18(Suppl. 1):S140
  43. Rich J, McKenzie M, Macalino GE, Taylor L, Sanford-Colby S, Wolf F, et al. A syringe prescription program to prevent infectious disease and improve health of injection drug users. Journal of Urban Health. 1999;81(1):122–134
  44. Roe v. City of New York. (2002). 31599522 (S.D. N.Y. 2002).
  45. Shearing C, Ericsson R. Culture as figurative action. British Journal of Sociology. 1991;42:482
  46. UNAIDS. (2004). 2004 report on the global AIDS epidemic (UNAIDS/04.16E). Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.
  47. Wood E, Kerr T, Small W, Jones J, Schechter MT, Tyndall MW. The impact of a police presence on access to needle exchange programs [letter]. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes: JAIDS. 2003;34(1):116–118

PII: S0955-3959(05)00050-2

doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.01.009

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 16, Issue 4 , Pages 267-274 , August 2005