How the harm reduction movement contrasts itself against punitive prohibition

References 

1. Alasuutari P. Individualism, self-control, and the Finnish temperance movement. Ethnos. 1991;56(3–4):173–188
2. Erickson P, Riley D, Cheung Y, O’Hare P. Harm reduction: A new direction for drug policies and programs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1997;
3. Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, O’Hare P. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction. From faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.; 1993;
4. Hurme T. Jumping out of Harm's way – harm reduction in Finnish drug policy: Conceptual problems and contradictions. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. 2004;21:17–27(English Supplement)
5. Keane H. Critiques of harm reduction, morality and the promise of human rights. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2003;14(3):227–232
6. Levine HG. The secret of worldwide drug prohibition. The varieties and uses of drug prohibition. The Independent Review VII. 2002;2:165–180
7. McDermott P. Representations of drug users: Facts, myths and their role in harm reduction. In:  O’Hare P,  Newcombe R,  Matthews A,  Buning E,  Drucker E editor. The reduction of drug-related harm. London: Routledge; 1992;
8. Miller P. A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia. Critical Public Health. 2001;11(2):167–178
9. Mugford S. Harm reduction: Does it lead where its proponents imagine?. In:  Heather N,  Wodak A,  Nadelmann E,  O’Hare P editor. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction. From faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.; 1993;
10. Nadelmann EA. Progressive legalizers, progressive prohibitionists and the reduction of drug-related harm. In:  Heather N,  Wodak A,  Nadelmann E,  O’Hare P editor. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction. From faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.; 1993;
11. O’Hare P, Newcombe R, Matthews A, Buning E, Drucker E. The reduction of drug-related harm. London: Routledge; 1992;
12. Parsons T. The social system. New York: The Free Press; 1951;
13. Petersen A, Lupton D. The new public health Health and self in the age of risk. London: Sage Publications; 1996;
14. Rhodes T. The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2002;13(2):85–94
15. Sulkunen P, Warpenius K. Reforming the self and the other: The temperance movement and the duality of modern subjectivity. Critical Public Health. 2000;10(4):423–438
16. Tammi T. Harm reduction school of thought: Three fractions. Contemporary Drug Problems. 2004;31(3):381–399