International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 442-449, December 2008

Heroin transition risk among daily and non-daily cannabis users who are non-injectors of heroin

  • Avelardo Valdez

      Affiliations

    • Office for Drug and Social Policy Research, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, 237 Social Work Building, Houston, TX 77204-4013, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Fax: +1 713 743 3985.
  • ,
  • Alice Cepeda

      Affiliations

    • Office for Drug and Social Policy Research and Department of Sociology, University of Houston, 237 Social Work Building, Houston, TX 77204-4013, United States
    • Fax: +1 713 743 3985.
  • ,
  • Alan Neaigus

      Affiliations

    • Institute for International Research on Youth at Risk, National Development and Research Institutes, Inc., 71 West 23rd Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10010, United States
  • ,
  • Amy Russell

      Affiliations

    • Office for Drug and Social Policy Research, Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, 237 Social Work Building, Houston, TX 77204-4013, United States
    • Fax: +1 713 743 3985.

Received 20 October 2006; received in revised form 13 June 2007; accepted 18 June 2007. published online 07 August 2007.

Abstract 

Aims

Non-injecting heroin use (NIU) has been identified as a potential precursor for the transition to injecting drug use (IDU). This paper examines and compares heroin transition risks between two groups of Mexican American cannabis users (daily (DU) vs. non-daily (NDU)) who are NIUs.

Methods

Data for this analysis are from structured interviews with 300 street-based recruited male and female NIUs in San Antonio, Texas using an adaptive sampling methodology. Three variables (being a former injector, daily heroin use, and being dependent on heroin) were used to create a summative scale measuring heroin transition risk and dichotomized into “no attributes” and “1–3 attributes”.

Results

Initial univariate logistic regression analysis indicated an association between heroin transition risk and the cannabis user groups with three fourths of the NDU having transition risk attributes. In the multivariate model, three factors were found to be independently associated with heroin transition risk. Heroin transition risk was positively associated with having used heroin for a longer period of time. An inverse relationship was found with DU of cannabis and those reporting alcohol use in the past month being less likely to be associated with heroin transition risks.

Conclusions

Findings tentatively indicate that DU of cannabis may be interpreted as a form of self-regulation and potentially deterring problematic heroin use among Mexican American NIUs and possibly other polydrug users in similar social environments. However, the authors discuss alternative interpretations of these findings. Nevertheless, findings may be used to inform specific policies and intervention strategies to prevent transitions to injecting and other harmful health consequences among NIUs.

Keywords: Heroin transition risks, Non-injecting heroin use, Cannabis use, Mexican Americans

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0955-3959(07)00114-4

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.06.004

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 19, Issue 6 , Pages 442-449, December 2008