On the threshold: How relevant should quantity be in determining intent to supply?

References 

1. ACPO (2003). Cannabis enforcement guidance. London: ACPO. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.acpo.police.uk/asp/policies/Data/canabis_enforcement.doc.
2. Alexander R, Gyamerah J. Differential punishing of African Americans and Whites who possess drugs: A Just Policy or a Continuation of the Past?. Journal of Black Studies. 1997;28(1):97
3. Allen L, Trace M, Klein A. Decriminalisation of drugs in Portugal: A current overview. DrugScope/The Beckley Foundation. 2004;
4. Bonnici, T. (2005). 500 joints pot limit plan. In The Sun Monday. December 11. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,2-2005550699,00.html.
5. Cobain, I., & Boffey, C. (2006). Drugs arrest study sparks racism claim. In The Guardian Monday. September 18.
6. Council of the European Union (2003). Press Release, 2548th Council-Justice & Home Affairs-Brussels, 27–28 November, 2003. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.euractiv.com/Article?tcmuri=tcm:29-111619-16&type=News.
7. EMCDDA (2003). The role of the quantity in the prosecution of drug offences. Portugal: EMCDDA.
8. EMCDDA (2005). Illicit drug use in the EU: Legislative approaches. Portugal: EMCDDA.
9. Fortson R. Misuse of drugs: Offences. Confiscation and money laundering. 5th ed.. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2005;(pp. 784–785)
10. Free M. The impact of federal sentencing reforms on African Americans. Journal of Black Studies. 1997;28(2):268
11. Home Affairs Select Committee (2002). The government's drugs policy: Is it working? London: House of Commons.
12. House of Commons Standing Committee F (2004). Drugs bill, 2004. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.publications.parliament.uk.
13. Home Office (2004). Drugs bill: Final regulatory impact assessment. London: Home Office.
14. Home Office (2006). Summary of responses to the home office consultation letter on Section 2 of the Drugs Act 2005. London: Home Office. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.drugs.gov.uk/publication-search/reducing-supply/thresholds-response/thresholds-responses?view=Binary.
15. Joint Committee on Human Rights (2004). Scrutiny: Third progress report. London: House of Commons/House of Lords.
16. Kalunta-Crumpton A. Race and drug trials: The social construction of guilt and innocence. Aldershot: Ashgate; 1999;
17. Kautt P, Spohn C. Crack-ing down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly. 2002;19(1):1
18. Loo M, Beusekom I, Kahan J. Decriminalization of drug use in Portugal: The development of a policy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2002;582:49
    • CrossRef
19. Mwenda L. Drug offenders in England and Wales 2004. London: Home Office; 2005;(HOSB 23/05)
20. Newcombe, R. (2006). Quantity thresholds for distinguishing drug possession from possession with intent to supply in Britain: A review of relevant evidence. Manchester: Lifeline. Retrieved 19th April from http://www.lifeline.org.uk/documents/Thresholds_Report_FINAL.pdf.
21. SU Drugs Project (2003). Phase 1 report: Understanding the issues. London: Strategy Unit. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2005/07/05/Report.pdf.
22. Transform Drug Policy Foundation (2005). Response to the drugs bill 2005. Second reading briefing. London: Transform, 2005. Retrieved 14th April from http://www.tdpf.org.uk.
23. Travis, A. (2006). Revealed: How 10 joints could lead to 14 years for dealing. In The Guardian Wednesday, June 7. Retrieved 19th April 2007 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/drugs/Story/0,1791915,00.html.