International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 514-520 , November 2009

Casting light on harm reduction: Introducing two instruments for analysing contradictions between harm reduction and ‘non-harm reduction’

Received 5 July 2008 ,Revised 20 January 2009 ,Accepted 26 February 2009.

References 

  1. Alexander BK. The disease and adaptive models of addiction: A framework for evaluation. In:  Peele S editors. Visions of addiction. New York: Lexington Books; 1988;p. 45–66
  2. Alexander BK. Beyound Vancouver's “Four Pillars. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2006;17(2):118–123
  3. Davenport-Hines Richard. The pursuit of oblivion—A global history of narcotics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company; 2002;
  4. ECAD Newsletter. (1999–2008). A bimonthly published by the Sweden based organisation European Cities Against Drugs (ECAD). No. 35-115. Can be partially retrieved at http://www.www.ecad.net.
  5. Ege, P. (1997). Harm Reduction–hvad ligger vi i det? (What is harm reduction?—quote translated from Danish by author). STOF 2, 10–12. Copenhagen: Narkotikaraadet.
  6. Friedman Milton. The drug war as a socialist enterprise. In:  Arnold S, Trebach ,  Kevin B, Zeese  editor. Friedman & Szasz on liberty and drugs—Essays on the free market and prohibition. Washington D.C.: The Drug Policy Foundation Press; 1992;
  7. Goldberg Ted. Demystifying drugs—A psychosocial perspective. London: Macmillan Press Ltd,; 1999;
  8. Gossop Michael. Living with drugs. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing; 2000;
  9. Hathaway Andrew D. Shortcomings of harm reduction: Towards a morally invested drug reform strategy. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2001;12(2):125–137
  10. Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, Pat O’Hare . Psychoactive drugs & harm reduction. From faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers; 1993;Preface v
  11. Hobden, Karen L., & Cunningham, John A. (2006). Barriers to the dissemination of four harm reduction strategies: A survey of addiction treatment providers in Ontorio. Harm Reduction Journal. 3, 35. Retrieved 14th March 2008 at http://www.harmreductionjournal.com/content/3/1/35.
  12. Hudebine H. Applying cognitive policy analysis to the drug issue: Harm reduction and the reversal of the deviatization of drug users in Britain 1985-1997. Addiction Research and Theory. 2005;13(3):231–243
  13. Jourdan, Michael. (1996). Om at forstå forsøget med heroin i Schweiz (Understanding the Swiss Heroin Trials). Aarhus: Centre of Alcohol and Drug Research.
  14. Leeuw E, Marshall IH. Between Prohibition and Legalization—The Dutch Experiment in Drug Policy. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications; 1994;
  15. Levine HG. Global drug prohibition: Its uses and crises. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2003;14(2):145–153
  16. Lough Graham. Law enforcement and harm reduction: Mutually exclusive or mutually compatible. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1997;9(3):169–173
  17. MacCaun Robert J, Reuter Peter. Drug war heresies—Learning form other vices, times & places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001;
  18. Ministry of Health, British Columbia. (2005). Harm Reduction. A British Columbia Community Guide. 3.
  19. Narcotic Counsel. (1999). Report of The Working Group on Harm Reduction (Quote translated from Danish by author). Copenhagen 5.
  20. Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (1996). A guide to Dutch policy. The Hague.
  21. Nielsen, F. S. (1996). Alfred Sidgwicks Argumentationsteori (doctoral thesis). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
  22. Peele S. Assumptions about drug policies and the marketing of drug policies. In:  Bickel WK,  DeGrandpre RJ editor. Drug policy and human nature. New York: Plenum; 1995;p. 199–220
  23. Polak, F. (2000). Thinking About Drug Law Reform: Some Political Dynamics of Medicalization. Fordham Urban Law Journal vol. XXXVIII. Retrieved 2nd March 2008 from http://www.cedro-uva.org/lib/polak.medicalization.html.
  24. Popper, Karl R. (1963 and 1991). Conjectures and Refutations—The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge.
  25. Popper, K. R. (1974 and 1993). Unended Quest. London: Routledge. 19.
  26. Rosenbaum Marsha. Safety first—A reality-based approach to teens and drugs. Drug Policy Alliance. 2007;
  27. Sowell T. A conflict of visions—Ideological origins of political struggles. New York: William Morrow and Company; 1987;
  28. Tammi T, Hurme T. How the harm reduction movement contrasts itself against punitive prohibition. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2006;18(2):84–87
  29. Weil, Andrew. (1983 and 2004). From Chocolate to Morphine. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
  30. Welbourne-Wood David. Harm Reduction in Australia: Some problems putting policy into practice. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1999;10(5):403–413
  31. Wodak A. Editorial: What is this thing called harm reduction?. International Journal of Drug Policy. 1999;10(3):169–171
  32. Zimmer Lynn, Morgan John P. Marihuana myths, marihuana facts: A review of the scientific evidence. New York: The Lindesmith Center; 1997;

PII: S0955-3959(09)00054-1

doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.011

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 514-520 , November 2009