International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 521-528 , November 2009

Drug testing in Australian schools: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures

  • Ann M. Roche

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Flinders University, National Centre for Education and Training, Bedford Park, SA5042, Australia. Fax: +61 08 8201 7550.
    • ,
  • Petra Bywood

      Affiliations

    • Fax: +61 08 8201 7550.
    • ,
  • Ken Pidd

      Affiliations

    • Fax: +61 08 8201 7550.
    • ,
  • Toby Freeman

      Affiliations

    • Fax: +61 08 8201 7550.
    • ,
  • Tania Steenson

      Affiliations

    • Fax: +61 08 8201 7550.

Received 1 July 2008 ,Revised 25 March 2009 ,Accepted 2 April 2009.

References 

  1. Allen D, Coombes L, Foxcroft D. The role of parents and the community in drug prevention. In:  Midford R,  Munro G editor. Drug education in schools: Searching for the silver bullet. Melbourne: IP Communications; 2006;
  2. Australian Institute of Health Welfare . National drug strategy household survey 2004: Detailed findings. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2005;
  3. Australian Law Reform Commission . Seen and heard: Priority for children in the legal process. Canberra: ALRC; 1997;(No. ALRC 84)
  4. Australian Law Reform Commission . Essentially yours: The protection of human genetic information in Australia. Canberra: ALRC; 2003;(No. ALRC 96)
  5. Australian Law Reform Commission . Review of privacy. Canberra: ALRC; 2006;(No. Issue paper 31)
  6. Baptista MJ, Monsanto PV, Pinho Marques EG, Bermejo A, Avila S, Castanheira AM, et al. Hair analysis for delta(9)-THC, delta(9)-THC-COOH, CBN and CBD, by GC/MS-EI. Comparison with GC/MS-NCI for delta(9)-THC-COOH. Forensic Science International. 2002;128(1–2):66–78
  7. Board of Education of Independent Schools Dist. No. 92 of Pottawatomie City v Earls (2002). 536822 (United States Court of Appeal).
  8. Bond L, Patton G, Glover S, Carlin JB, Butler H, Thomas L, et al. The gatehouse project: Can a multilevel school intervention affect emotional wellbeing and health risk behaviours?. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2004;58(12):997–1003
  9. Brady H. Hunterdon Central Regional High School: Impact of student random drug testing program on drug use by students. Flemington, New Jersey: Student Drug Testing Coalition; 2004;
  10. Commonwealth v Introvigne (1982). 150 258 (High Court of Australia).
  11. Convention on the Rights of the Child (1991). 4.
  12. Coombs RH, Coombs CJ. The impact of drug testing on the morale and well-being of mandatory participants. International Journal of Addiction. 1991;26(9):981–992
  13. Cox RG, Zhang L, Johnson WD, Bender DR. Academic performance and substance use: Findings from a state survey of public high school students. Journal of School Health. 2007;77(3):109–115
  14. Crouch DJ, Walsh JM, Flegel R, Cangianelli L, Baudys J, Atkins R. An evaluation of selected oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2005;29(4):244–248
  15. Department of Health and Community Services v JWB and SMB (1922). 175218 (High Court of Australia).
  16. DuPont RL, Campbell TG, Mazza JJ. Elements of a successful school-based student drug testing program. Rockville, MD: Institute for Behavior and Health; 2002;
  17. Durlak JA, Taylor RD, Kawashima K, Pachan MK, DuPre EP, Celio CI, et al. Effects of positive youth development programs on school, family, and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2007;39(3–4):269–286
  18. Eichhorst J, Etter M, Lepage J, Lehotay DC. Urinary screening for methylphenidate (Ritalin) abuse: A comparison of liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and immunoassay methods. Clinical Biochemistry. 2004;37(3):175–183
  19. EPOC (2002, August 4, 2004). Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group (EPOC): The data collection checklist. Retrieved 24th February, 2005, from http://www.epoc.uottawa.ca/checklist2002.doc
  20. Evans-Whipp T, Bond L, Toumbourou JW, Catalano RF. School, parent, and student perspectives of school drug policies. Journal of School Health. 2007;77(3):138–145
  21. Faggiano, F., Vigna-Taglianti, F. D., Versino, E., Zambon, A., Borraccino, A. & Lemma, P. (2005). School-based prevention for illicit drugs’ use (Review): The Cochrane Collaboration.
  22. Foxcroft, D. R., Ireland, D., Lister-Sharp, D. J., Lowe, G., & Breen, R. (2002). Primary prevention for alcohol misuse in young people (Review): The Cochrane Collaboration (3).
  23. George S, Braithwaite RA. A preliminary evaluation of five rapid detection kits for on site drugs of abuse screening. Addiction. 1995;90(2):227–232
  24. George S, Braithwaite RA. Use of on-site testing for drugs of abuse. Clinical Chemistry. 2002;48(10):1639–1646
  25. Goldberg L, Elliot DL, MacKinnon DP, Moe E, Kuehl KS, Nohre L, et al. Drug testing athletes to prevent substance abuse: Background and pilot study results of the SATURN (Student Athlete Testing Using Random Notification) study. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2003;32(1):16–25
  26. Gronholm M, Lillsunde P. A comparison between on-site immunoassay drug-testing devices and laboratory results. Forensic Science International. 2001;121(1–2):37–46
  27. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Arthur MW. Promoting science-based prevention in communities. Addictive Behaviors. 2002;27(6):951–976
  28. Kern J, Gunja F, Cox A, Rosenbaum M, Appel J, Verma A. Making sense of student drug testing: Why educators are saying no. Oakland: American Civil Liberties Union & Drug Policy Alliance; 2006;(p. 32)
  29. Knight JR, Mears CJ. Testing for drugs of abuse in children and adolescents: Addendum—testing in schools and at home. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):627–630
  30. Levy S, Sherritt L, Vaughan BL, Germak M, Knight JR. Results of random drug testing in an adolescent substance abuse program. Pediatrics. 2007;119(4):e843–848
  31. Lu NT, Taylor BG. Drug screening and confirmation by GC–MS: Comparison of EMIT II and Online KIMS against 10 drugs between US and England laboratories. Forensic Science International. 2006;157(2–3):106–116
  32. Males MA. What do student drug use surveys really mean?. Journal of School Health. 2005;75(1):31–34
  33. Marlowe DB, Festinger DS, Foltz C, Lee PA, Patapis NS. Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 2005;23(2):183–198
  34. Masten AS. Regulatory processes, risk, and resilience in adolescent development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2004;1021:310–319(see comment)
  35. McKeganey N. Random drug testing of schoolchildren. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation; 2005;
  36. McKinney JR. Study of high schools with student drug-testing programs. Muncie, IN: Ball State University; 2004;
  37. Minister for Health v AS & Anor (2004). 286 (Western Australian Supreme Court 2004).
  38. Montagna M, Polettini A, Stramesi C, Groppi A, Vignali C. Hair analysis for opiates, cocaine and metabolites. Evaluation of a method by interlaboratory comparison. Forensic Science International. 2002;128(1–2):79–83
  39. Moody DE, Fang WB, Andrenyak DM, Monti KM, Jones C. A comparative evaluation of the instant-view 5-panel test card with OnTrak TesTcup Pro 5: Comparison with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2006;30(1):50–56
  40. New Jersey v TLO (1985). 469325 (United States Supreme Court 1985).
  41. NHMRC . A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Canberra, ACT: National Health and Medical Research Council, Commonwealth of Australia; 1999;
  42. Norden P. Keeping Them Connected: A national study examining how Catholic schools can best respond to incidents of illicit drug use. Richmond, Victoria: Jesuit Social Services, Ignatius Centre for Policy and Research; 2005;
  43. Peace MR, Tarnai LD, Poklis A. Performance evaluation of four on-site drug-testing devices for detection of drugs of abuse in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2000;24(7):589–594
  44. Perkins v Golden Plains Fodder Australia/Macpri Pty Ltd. (2004). 3 (South Australian Industrial Relations Commission).
  45. Pogarsky G, Piquero AR. Can punishment encourage offending? Investigating the “resetting” effect. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. 2003;40(1):95–120
  46. Resnick MD, Bearman PS, Blum RW, Bauman KE, Harris KM, Jones JP, et al. Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study on Adolescent Health. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1997;278(10):823–832
  47. Riley K, Lu NT, Taylor BG. Drug screening: A comparison of urinalysis results from two independent laboratories. Journal of Drug Issues. 2000;30(1):171–186Win
  48. Roche A, Pidd K, Bywood P, Duraisingam V, Steenson T, Freeman T, et al. Drug testing in schools: Evidence, impacts and alternatives. Canberra: Australian National Council on Drugs; 2008;
  49. Schaub G. Deterrence, compellence, and prospect theory. Political Psychology. 2004;25(3):389–411
  50. Spooner C, Hall W, Lynskey M. Structural determinants of youth drug use. Australia: Australian National Council on Drugs; 2001;
  51. Spoth RL, Redmond C, Shin C. Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: Adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2001;69(4):627–642
  52. Standards Australia . Procedures for the collection, detection and quantitation of drugs of abuse in urine: AS/NZS 4308:2001. Sydney: Standards Australia; 2001;
  53. Standards Australia . Procedures for specimen collection and the detection and quantitation of drugs in oral fluid: AS 4760-2006. Sydney: Standards Australia; 2006;
  54. Tait R, Hulse G. A systematic review of the effectiveness of brief interventions with substance using adolescents by type of drug. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2003;22:337–346
  55. Taras HL. Out-of-school suspension and expulsion. Pediatrics. 2003;112(5):1206–1209
  56. Tevyaw TO, Monti PM. Motivational enhancement and other brief interventions for adolescent substance abuse: Foundations, applications and evaluations. Addiction. 2004;99(Suppl. 2):63–75
  57. Thomas R, Perera R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration. 2006;
  58. Tobler NS, Stratton HH. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: A meta-analysis of the research. Journal of Primary Prevention. 1997;18(1):71–128
  59. Vernonia School District 47J v Acton et al. (1995). 515 646 (United States Supreme Court).
  60. Verstraete, A., & Puddu, M. (2000). Deliverable D4: Evaluation of different roadside drug tests. Retrieved 15 July 2007, from www.rosita.org.
  61. Verstraete, A., & Raes, E. (2006). Rosita 2 project: Final report. Retrieved 15 July 2007, from www.rosita.org.
  62. Walsh JM, Crouch DJ, Danaceau JP, Canngianelli L, Liddicoat L, Adkins R. Evaluation of ten oral fluid point-of-collection drug-testing devices. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2007;31(1):44–54
  63. Walsh JM, Flegel R, Crouch DJ, Cangianelli L, Baudys J. An evaluation of rapid point-of-collection oral fluid drug-testing devices. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2003;27(7):429–439(see comment)
  64. In:  Wilkinson R,  Marmot M editor. Social determinants of health: The solid facts. Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2003;
  65. Winters KC, Leitten W. Brief intervention for drug-abusing adolescents in a school setting. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2007;21(2):249–254
  66. Yamaguchi R, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. Relationship between student illicit drug use and school drug-testing policies. Journal of School Health. 2003;73(4):159–164
  67. Yamaguchi R, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. Drug testing in schools: Policies, practices and association with student drug use. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research; 2003;
  68. Yamaguchi R, Johnston LD, O’Malley PM. The relationship between student illicit drug use and school drug-testing policies. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 2003;

PII: S0955-3959(09)00061-9

doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.04.002

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 521-528 , November 2009

Article Tools