International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 455-457 , November 2009

Editors’ introduction: Policy change and policy analysis

  • Henri Bergeron

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Coordination Scientifique - Chaire Santé de Sciences Po Paris, Chargé de Recherches CNRS - Centre de Sociologie des Organisations, 19 rue Amélie, 75007 Paris, France.
  • ,
  • Peter Reuter

References 

  1. Bouchard M, Alain M, Nguyen H. Convenient labour: The prevalence and nature of youth involvement in the Marijuana Cultivation Industry. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):467–474
  2. Cattacin S, Lucas B. Autorégulation, intervention étatique, mise en réseau. Les transformations de l’Etat social en Europe. Les cas du VIH/SIDA, de l’abus d’alcool et des drogues illégales. Revue française de sciences politiques. 1999;49(3):379–398
  3. Caulkins J, Wallner D, Tragler G. Optimal timing of use vs. harm reduction in a drug epidemic model. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):480–487
  4. Costa Storti C, De Grauwe P. Modelling the cocaine and heroin markets in the era of globalization and drug reduction policies. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):488–496
  5. EMCDDA . Annual report: «selected issues» on drug-related public nuisance—Trends in policy and preventive measures. Luxembourg: EMCDDA; 2005;
  6. Hall W. The adverse health effects of cannabis use: What are they, and what are their implications for policy?. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):458–466
  7. Jourdan M. Casting light on harm reduction. Introducing two instruments for analyzing contradictions between harm reduction and ‘non-harm reduction’. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):514–520
  8. Klein A, Beckerleg S, Hailu D. Regulating khat—Dilemmas and opportunities for the international drug control system. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):509–513
  9. Nordt C, Stohler R. Low-threshold methadone treatment, heroin price, police activity and incidence of heroin use: The Zurich experience. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):497–501
  10. Ritter A. Methods for comparing drug policies—The utility of composite drug harm indexes. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):475–479
  11. Roche AM, Bywood P, Pidd K, Freeman T, Steenson TM. Drug testing in Australian schools: Policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):521–528
  12. Shiner M, Measham F. The legacy of normalisation: The role of classical and contemporary criminological theory in understanding young people's drug use. The International Journal of Drug Policy. 2009;20(6):502–508

PII: S0955-3959(09)00107-8

doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.05.003

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 20, Issue 6 , Pages 455-457 , November 2009