International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 315-320, July 2010

Local politics and retail cannabis markets: The case of the Dutch coffeeshops

University of Amsterdam, Bonger Institute for Criminology, P.O. Box 1030, 1000 BA Amsterdam, Netherlands

Received 10 June 2009; received in revised form 21 October 2009; accepted 3 January 2010. published online 01 February 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Cannabis coffeeshops are concentrated in specific areas in the Netherlands; close to 80% of Dutch municipalities have no coffeeshops. We investigated why such wide local differences exist.

Methods

Regression analyses were carried out on data regarding the number of coffeeshops per municipality, local council seat distribution and area demographic characteristics. A contrast analysis of municipalities with no/few vs. many coffeeshops was also performed.

Results

Whether a town has one or more coffeeshops can be predicted in part by its population size, but more strongly by political composition of the local council. The larger the percentage of progressive councillors, the greater the probability that coffeeshops are allowed. The number of coffeeshops in a town depends primarily on the demand for cannabis (reflected in factors like local population size); it generally has little to do with national-level party political preferences about drug policy.

Conclusion

Both the demand for coffeeshops and local political preference influence coffeeshop policy in the Netherlands.

Keywords: Cannabis, Coffeeshop, Local politics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0955-3959(10)00004-6

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.01.003

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 21, Issue 4 , Pages 315-320, July 2010