International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 381-389, September 2010

The effect of methamphetamine and heroin price on polydrug use: A behavioural economics analysis in Sydney, Australia

  • Jenny Chalmers

      Affiliations

    • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +61 2 93850189; fax: +61 2 93850222.
  • ,
  • Deborah Bradford

      Affiliations

    • New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
  • ,
  • Craig Jones

      Affiliations

    • New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia

Received 22 February 2010; received in revised form 10 June 2010; accepted 10 June 2010. published online 09 July 2010.

Abstract 

Background

A key aim of supply-side drug law enforcement is to reduce drug use by increasing the retail price of drugs. Since most illicit drug users are polydrug users the effectiveness of this strategy depends on the extent to which drug users reduce their overall consumption of drugs. The literature shows that drug users do reduce their consumption of a drug when its price increases. However the extent of that decrease and the implications for the use of other drugs vary across studies.

Methodology

A sample of 101 Australian methamphetamine users was surveyed using a behavioural economics approach. Participants were given a hypothetical fixed drug budget, presented with a range of drug price lists and asked how many units of each drug they would purchase. Methamphetamine and heroin prices were varied independently across trials.

Results

While demand for both methamphetamine and heroin was found to be price elastic, elasticity estimates were influenced by the nature of participants’ drug dependence. The group least responsive to changes in methamphetamine price were those dependent only on methamphetamine, while the group most responsive were dependent only on heroin. Similar findings emerged in relation to changes in heroin price. Cross-price elasticity analysis showed limited substitution into other drugs as the price of methamphetamine increased. In contrast, for heroin, there was significant substitution into pharmaceutical opioids and to a lesser extent, benzodiazepines and methamphetamine. However, for the most part, the decreases in methamphetamine or heroin consumption outweighed any substitution into other drugs.

Conclusion

The reduction in overall drug consumption and expenditure in response to price increases in heroin and methamphetamine observed in this sample lend support to supply-side enforcement strategies that aim to increase retail drug price. Notably, this analysis highlights the importance of accounting for the nature of users’ drug dependence in estimating price responsiveness.

Keywords: Behavioural economic analysis, Price elasticity, Methamphetamine, Heroin, Polydrug use, Supply-side drug law enforcement

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0955-3959(10)00097-6

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2010.06.002

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 381-389, September 2010