International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 6-15, January 2012

If supply-oriented drug policy is broken, can harm reduction help fix it? Melding disciplines and methods to advance international drug-control policy

  • Victoria A. Greenfield

      Affiliations

    • Department of Economics, U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD 21402, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 410 293 6896; fax: +1 410 293 6899.
  • ,
  • Letizia Paoli

      Affiliations

    • LINC, Leuven Institute of Criminology, K.U. Leuven Faculty of Law, Hooverplein 10-11, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
    • Tel: +32 016 325274.

Received 22 October 2010; received in revised form 1 April 2011; accepted 26 April 2011. published online 21 June 2011.

Abstract 

Critics of the international drug-control regime contend that supply-oriented policy interventions are not just ineffective, but, in focusing almost exclusively on supply reduction, they also produce unintended adverse consequences. Evidence from the world heroin market supports their claims. The balance of the effects of policy is yet unknown, but the prospect of adverse consequences underlies a central paradox of contemporary supply-oriented policy. In this paper, we evaluate whether harm reduction, a subject of intense debate in the demand-oriented drug-policy community, can provide a unifying foundation for supply-oriented drug policy and speak more directly to policy goals. Our analysis rests on an extensive review of the literature on harm reduction and draws insight from other policy communities’ disciplines and methods. First, we explore the paradoxes of supply-oriented policy that initially motivated our interest in harm reduction; second, we consider the conceptual and technical challenges that have contributed to the debate on harm reduction and assess their relevance to a supply-oriented application; third, we examine responses to those challenges, i.e., various tools (taxonomies, models, and measurement strategies), that can be used to identify, categorize, and assess harms. Despite substantial conceptual and technical challenges, we find that harm reduction can provide a basis for assessing the net consequences of supply-oriented drug policy, choosing more rigorously amongst policy options, and identifying new options. In addition, we outline a practical path forward for assessing harms and policy options. On the basis of our analysis, we suggest pursuing a harm-based approach and making a clearer distinction between supply-oriented and supply-reduction policy.

Keywords: International drug-control policy, Drug supply, Harm reduction, Supply reduction, Risk assessment, Cost-benefit analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone.

PII: S0955-3959(11)00061-2

doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2011.04.007

International Journal of Drug Policy
Volume 23, Issue 1 , Pages 6-15, January 2012