Research paper
Profiles of quality of life in opiate-dependent individuals after starting methadone treatment: A latent class analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.09.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to identify classes of quality of life (QoL) among opiate-dependent individuals five to ten years after starting methadone treatment in order to tailor services to the needs of this population.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of 159 opiate-dependent individuals who started outpatient methadone treatment in the region of Ghent, Belgium, between 1997 and 2002. A face-to-face structured interview was administered based on the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile, the EuropASI, Brief Symptom Inventory and the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale for Methadone Treatment. Latent class analysis was used to determine patterns of QoL. Analyses of variance and chi-square tests were used to test whether class membership was related to socio-demographic, health- and drug-related variables.

Results

Based on fit criteria, a three-class model was selected. Class Low (14.5%), ‘opiate-dependent individuals living in marginal conditions’, is characterised by low QoL scores on all domains. Class Intermediate (25.8%), ‘stabilized, but socially excluded opiate-dependent individuals’ shows high scores on the domains ‘safety’ and ‘living situation’, but low scores on all other QoL domains. Class High (59.7%), ‘socially included opiate-dependent individuals’, is characterised by high QoL scores on all domains, except ‘finances’.

Conclusion

The findings of this study illustrate the existence of different profiles of QoL among opiate-dependent individuals after starting methadone maintenance treatment and demonstrate the need for a continuing care approach. Insight into distinct classes of QoL can be used to design person-centred support, relevant to an individual's personal life.

Introduction

Quality of life (QoL) has become an important outcome measure and useful assessment tool in health care for individuals suffering from chronic illnesses (Higginson and Carr, 2001, Katschnig, 2006). Recent recognition that addiction is a chronic disorder and – consequently – requires a continuing care and support approach has resulted in growing attention to QoL in substance abuse research, mainly among opiate users (McLellan, 2002, Zubaran and Foresti, 2009). The rather limited and late attention to QoL in substance abusers contrasts sharply with studies on other chronic illnesses, such as cancer and schizophrenia, in which improved QoL is regarded as an important treatment objective (Sanders, Egger, Donovan, Tallon, & Frankel, 1998). Due to the related health and socio-economic consequences of substance dependence, most outcome studies in substance abuse research focus on aspects such as abstinence of illegal drugs, reducing the health risks involved with drug use, and the absence of criminal involvement. Limited consideration is given to outcomes important for opiate-dependent individuals themselves (Fischer et al., 2005, Ruefli and Rogers, 2004). This unilateral focus on socially desirable outcomes is inappropriate if one wants to take person-centred outcomes such as QoL into account (Fischer et al., 2005, Hagenow, 2003).

QoL is a broad, encompassing concept influenced by an individual's expectations and personal perspective, which can only be judged by the person him/herself (Allison et al., 1997, Parse, 2007). The importance or weight people attach to various dimensions or domains of QoL can differ greatly between individuals and within groups, based on their individual values and priorities, and can fluctuate through their personal course of life (Carr and Higginson, 2001, Carr et al., 1996). The focus in QoL is not only on health aspects, but it represents a wide range of life domains (e.g. self-determination, leisure and social participation, self-esteem, finances) important for an individual's life (Holmes, 2005, Schalock, 1996). Consequently, the multidimensionality of the concept QoL, together with the individualistic nature of the construct, may result in a strong heterogeneity and variation in QoL scores between individuals.

Most studies on QoL in substance abuse research are based on average QoL scores of a specific sample to demonstrate preferences of the whole group. By doing so, potential heterogeneity (inter-individual variability) within the population is ignored. Mean scores do not differentiate sufficiently and lack information on the diversity of results starting from an individual level, resulting in a loss of relevant information. Latent class analysis (LCA) is a type of modelling with categorical latent variables that gives attention to the heterogeneity of individual response patterns and defines unique subgroups in a sample (de Dios et al., 2010, Monga et al., 2007, Moss et al., 2007, Muthén and Muthén, 2000). The different subgroups in latent classes are not known in advance, as in a variable-centred approach, but are directly derived from the complete dataset based on individual responses (Muthén & Muthén, 2000). A study on illegal opiate users in Canada using LCA demonstrated that various subgroups of illegal opiate-users could be distinguished in terms of co-occurring drug use, comorbidity, and living situation (Monga et al., 2007). A recent study of Schand, Slade, Degenhardt, Baillie, and Nelson (2010) illustrated that opiate dependence can be divided in two distinct classes based on severity of dependence, with a higher risk of externalising disorders when the severity of opiate dependence increases. Furthermore, research has demonstrated that large differences exist between opiate-users in the community and those seeking treatment; however, large differences in the group seeking help were also noticeable (Eland-Goossensen et al., 1997, Schand et al., 2010). Variation in the QoL of different groups of opiate-dependent individuals in substitution treatment (e.g. presence or absence of comorbidity, gender differences) has been demonstrated in various studies (Bizzarri et al., 2005, De Maeyer et al., 2010, Fassino et al., 2004, Giacomuzzi et al., 2005). However, research on heterogeneity in a specific sample of opiate-dependent individuals is lacking, though such heterogeneity can have a large impact on the individual client and on the generalization of results (Donaldson & Moinpour, 2002).

Consequently, the aim of this study is to examine the response patterns concerning QoL of a sample of opiate-dependent individuals who started methadone treatment five to ten years ago. Given the fact that different groups of clients with their own specific needs and characteristics appeal to methadone treatment and the strong subjective character of QoL, heterogeneity in the QoL scores of opiate-dependent individuals can be expected (Bonomi et al., 2000, De Maeyer et al., 2011a, Fischer et al., 2005, Gourlay et al., 2005). The focus of the present study is to identify classes of opiate-dependent individuals with different QoL profiles. The following research questions were formulated:

  • Which patterns of QoL can be distinguished in opiate-dependent individuals five to ten years after starting methadone treatment?

  • Are these QoL-patterns related to socio-demographic, drug-, health- and person-related variables?

Section snippets

Study sample and design

This study was set up as a cross-sectional study on the current QoL of a cohort of opiate-dependent individuals who started outpatient methadone treatment in the region of Ghent (Belgium) between 1997 and 2002. This time frame was chosen because the first medical-social care centre for outpatient methadone treatment was opened in 1997 and we intended to monitor the current situation of opiate-dependent persons who started methadone treatment during the first six years. It has been estimated

Sample characteristics

Respondents were predominantly male (74.8%), with an average age of 36.6 years (SD = 7.5). The mean duration of methadone treatment was 7.6 years (SD = 4.4). A high proportion of the sample (86.5%) had followed at least two methadone treatment episodes. Almost three-quarters of the sample (74.2%) was currently still on methadone. Half of the participants (49.7%) reported recent heroin use and 54.1% scored above the clinical cut-off score for overall psychopathology (cf. Table 1).

Latent class analysis

Fit statistics were

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate different profiles of QoL among opiate-dependent individuals and their relatedness with socio-demographic, drug-, health- and person-related variables. The findings of our study support the existence of three distinct classes of QoL among opiate-dependent individuals five to ten years after starting methadone treatment and provide a better understanding of the heterogeneous character of QoL.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge the Special Research Fund of Ghent University, Belgium, for funding this study.

References (72)

  • M.H. Frost et al.

    Applying quality-of-life data formally and systematically into clinical practice

    Mayo Clinical Proceedings

    (2007)
  • S. Holmes

    Assessing the quality of life—Reality or impossible dream? A discussion paper

    International Journal of Nursing Studies

    (2005)
  • A.T. McLellan et al.

    The 5th edition of the addiction severity index

    Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

    (1992)
  • N. Monga et al.

    Using latent class analysis (LCA) to analyze patterns of drug use in a population of illegal opioid users

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2007)
  • H.B. Moss et al.

    Subtypes of alcohol dependence in a nationally representative sample

    Drug and Alcohol Dependence

    (2007)
  • R. Schalock et al.

    The conceptualization and measurement of quality of life: Implications for program planning and evaluation in the field of intellectual disabilities

    Evaluation and Program Planning

    (2008)
  • J. Ward et al.

    Role of maintenance treatment in opioid dependence

    The Lancet

    (1999)
  • A.R. Winstock et al.

    Should I stay or should I go?” Coming of methadone and buprenorphine treatment

    International Journal of Drug Policy

    (2011)
  • J. Bizzarri et al.

    Dual diagnosis and quality of life in patients in treatment for opioid dependence

    Substance Use & Misuse

    (2005)
  • P. Blanken et al.

    Outcome of long-term heroin-assisted treatment offered to chronic, treatment-resistant heroin addicts in the Netherlands

    Addiction

    (2010)
  • E. Broekaert et al.

    ‘The human prerogative’: A critical analysis of evidence-based and other paradigms of care in substance abuse research

    Psychiatric Quarterly

    (2010)
  • E. Broekaert et al.

    The search for an integrated paradigm of care models for people with handicaps, disabilities and behavioural disorders at the department of orthopedagogy of Ghent University

    Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities

    (2004)
  • R.K. Brooner et al.

    Using behavioral reinforcement to improve methadone treatment participation

    Science & Practice Perspectives

    (2002)
  • H. Cantril

    The pattern of human concerns

    (1965)
  • A.J. Carr et al.

    Measuring quality of life: Are quality of life measures patient centred?

    British Medical Journal

    (2001)
  • A.J. Carr et al.

    Quality of life measures

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1996)
  • K. Colpaert et al.

    Comparison of single and multiple agency clients in substance abuse treatment services

    European Addiction Research

    (2007)
  • Corr, C. (2002). Engaging the hard-to-reach. An evaluation of an outreach service....
  • E. De Beurs

    Brief Symptom Inventory, handleiding

    (2006)
  • J. De Maeyer et al.

    Current quality of life (QoL) and its determinants among opiate-dependent individuals five years after starting methadone treatment

    Quality of Life Research

    (2011)
  • L.R. Derogatis et al.

    The brief symptom inventory: An introductory report

    Psychological Medicine

    (1983)
  • G.W. Donaldson et al.

    Individual differences in quality-of-life treatment response

    Medical Care

    (2002)
  • R.E. Drake et al.

    Management of persons with co-occurring severe mental illness and substance use disorder: Program implications

    World Psychiatry

    (2007)
  • A. Eland-Goossensen et al.

    Heroin addicts in the community and in treatment compared for severity of problems and need for help

    Substance Use & Misuse

    (1997)
  • D.A. Fiellin et al.

    Methadone maintenance in primary care—A randomized controlled trial

    JAMA – Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2001)
  • B. Fischer et al.

    Eyes wide shut?—A conceptual and empirical critique of methadone maintenance treatment

    European Addiction Research

    (2005)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Health-related quality of life and opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy: A secondary analysis of a clinical trial

      2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Statistical significance was assessed at the standard 5 % level. No standardized procedure of identifying the optimal number of latent classes in a regression mixture model has been proposed (Nylund et al., 2007); therefore, we developed a decision algorithm synthesized from approaches reported in recently published studies that conducted latent class analyses of HRQoL and patterns of drug use among similar populations (Larance et al., 2014; Dowsey et al., 2015; De Maeyer et al., 2013; Green et al., 2010; Krebs et al., 2011; Nosyk et al., 2011). Details on the selection algorithm can be found in the online supplement, but are briefly described here.

    • Quality of life of individuals seeking treatment at specialist non-government alcohol and other drug treatment services: A latent class analysis

      2018, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      This finding is consistent with physiological disturbances that often accompany withdrawal (WHO, 2018) and the acute nature of presentations to withdrawal management services. The greater likelihood of individuals to be in low and moderate QOL classes in the present study compared to de Maeyer et al.'s (2013) US sample may be partly attributable to differences in participant characteristics between countries. For example, normative comparisons on the standardised Addiction Severity Index suggested that those entering residential treatment in Australia appear to have higher addiction (and other domains) severities than those entering residential treatment in the some USA samples (Deane, Kelly, Crowe, Coulson, & Lyons, 2013).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text