Research paperRisks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy
Section snippets
Prices, costs and risks
The price of any commodity is expected to continually increase as the commodity moves from source to user. The first owner will sell his product at a price high enough to cover his own costs and eventually make some profit. That buyer will likely sell at a higher price, again to cover his own costs (which include the costs of the first owner) and make some profit, and so on. Costs are passed on to the next buyer, who passes them on to the next, etc. until the commodity reaches the final buyer –
Drug trafficking in the world-economy
Structure may, however, have a more subtle effect on commodity prices. It is expected that some countries will have more wealth than others due to differential access to raw materials, more effective production means, lower wages, etc. The world-system perspective argues that today's world-economy is a global trade network “built” on unequal political and economic agreements (Chase-Dunn, 1989, Chase-Dunn, 2002, Wallerstein, 1974, Wallerstein, 1979). The world-system argument is thus not only
Trade networks
A major contribution of the world-system perspective was to shift the focus of analysis from individual countries to the relations between them. Empirical tests of the world-system perspective then quickly used tools of social network analysis (SNA). A similar trend can be observed for drug trafficking: recent editions of the World Drug Report, a widely-cited annual publication by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), include a discussion of drug “flows” and “routes” between
Data and network construction
The primary data for this study was gathered together by the UNODC and covers a 10-year period from 1998 to 2007. The UNODC releases an overview of various indicators of drug trafficking and consumption in its annual report, World Drug Report. Most indicators are collected through an annual survey, the Annual Questionnaire Reports (ARQ), which is filled out by officials in different countries. In instances in which ARQ data are not available, the UNODC complements with data from other sources,
Limitations
As in any macro-level study, all variables are very rough measures of the concepts of interest. Furthermore, most data on drugs was collected through various annual surveys completed on a voluntary basis. Biases and errors (deliberate or not) are expected but difficult to document. Also, there is an important number of missing cases, especially for price data. In general, developed countries tend to provide more information than less developed countries, but there are exceptions. It was
Results and discussion
Consistent with the observations of Farrell et al. (1996) there is a statistically significant and positive correlation between prices for cocaine, heroin, and cannabis in a country; as a general rule, when one drug is high-priced in a given country, other drugs are also high-priced, suggesting that there is a set of common factors that explain drug prices. However, the correlations are sufficiently low to require further examination. Consequently, analyses are provided for three types of
Conclusion
Drug trafficking is an illegal activity that consists of multilateral exchanges of prohibited goods between producers, distributors, and consumers in a market-like context (Naylor, 2003). At the global level, drug trafficking is best conceived as a series of relations between countries. Network analysis naturally fits this relational definition; knowledge about drug trafficking is gained from the combination of cross-national and relational analyses.
This paper aimed to test propositions derived
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest is declared.
Acknowledgements
This research was partly funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (Government of Canada). The author would like to thank Pierre Tremblay and Carlo Morselli for their support, comments and suggestions throughout the research. The author would also like to acknowledge the contribution of anonymous reviewers.
References (56)
- et al.
The organizational structure of international drug smuggling
Journal of Criminal Justice
(2010) Centrality and network flow
Social Networks
(2005)Domestic geographic variation in illicit drug prices
Journal of Urban Economics
(1995)Price and purity analysis for illicit drug: Data and conceptual issues
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2007)- et al.
Globalization and the price decline of illicit drugs
International Journal of Drug Policy
(2009) - et al.
Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweeness based on network flow
Social Networks
(1991) Development, crime and punishment: Accounting for the international differences in crime rates
Journal of Development Economics
(2004)- et al.
Betweeness centrality measures for directed graphs
Social Networks
(1994) Distance and the pattern of intra-European trade
The Review of Economics and Statistics
(1956)Le monde à l’envers: analyse de la structure du trafic transnational de drogues illicites
(2011)