Research paper
Correlates of intentions to use cannabis among US high school seniors in the case of cannabis legalization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.01.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Support for cannabis (“marijuana”) legalization is increasing in the United States (US). Use was recently legalized in two states and in Uruguay, and other states and countries are expected to follow suit. This study examined intentions to use among US high school seniors if cannabis were to become legally available.

Methods

Data from the last five cohorts (2007–2011) of high school seniors in Monitoring the Future, an annual nationally representative survey of students in the US were utilized. Data were analyzed separately for the 6116 seniors who reported no lifetime use of cannabis and the 3829 seniors who reported lifetime use (weighted Ns). We examined whether demographic characteristics, substance use and perceived friend disapproval towards cannabis use were associated with (1) intention to try cannabis among non-lifetime users, and (2) intention to use cannabis as often or more often among lifetime users, if cannabis was legal to use.

Results

Ten percent of non-cannabis-using students reported intent to initiate use if legal and this would be consistent with a 5.6% absolute increase in lifetime prevalence of cannabis use in this age group from 45.6% (95% CI = 44.6, 46.6) to 51.2% (95% CI = 50.2, 52.2). Eighteen percent of lifetime users reported intent to use cannabis more often if it was legal. Odds for intention to use outcomes increased among groups already at high risk for use (e.g., males, whites, cigarette smokers) and odds were reduced when friends disapproved of use. However, large proportions of subgroups of students normally at low risk for use (e.g., non-cigarette-smokers, religious students, those with friends who disapprove of use) reported intention to use if legal. Recent use was also a risk factor for reporting intention to use as often or more often.

Conclusion

Prevalence of cannabis use is expected to increase if cannabis is legal to use and legally available.

Introduction

The United States (US) is undergoing a drastic change in attitudes toward cannabis (“marijuana”) use and associated policy. The states of Colorado and Washington legalized recreational cannabis use in 2012 (Hawken et al., 2013, Healy, 2012), an additional 15 states have decriminalized cannabis use, and 19 states and the District of Columbia now allow medical cannabis to be prescribed (Pew Research Center, 2013). While other countries (e.g., The Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Italy) have partially or fully decriminalized use, Uruguay became the first country to legalize (and regulate) cannabis use in December of 2013 (Room, 2013, Romero, 2013). With public favor for legalization increasing, other states and countries are likely to follow suit. Given the lack of data that would allow us to examine how these recent policy changes affect prevalence of use, it is important to examine intentions to use in the case of legalization, as surrogate markers for actual behavior.

According to recent polls, more than half (52–58%) of adults in the US now support cannabis legalization (Pew Research Center, 2013, Swift, 2013) and 64% of adults feel the federal government should not take steps to enforce federal anti-cannabis laws in Colorado and Washington (Newport, 2012). Support for legalization is highest among young adults (ages 18–32), with 65% favoring legalization (Pew Research Center, 2013). In Australia, 65% of individuals age 12 and older feel that cannabis possession should not be a criminal offence, with males reporting higher support (Australian Institute of Health & Welfare, 2011). While more liberal cannabis laws appear to be driven by public support in many areas, interestingly, the legalization of cannabis in Uruguay does not appear to be as strongly supported by the public (CIFRA, 2013). The impact of more recent legalization policies on cannabis prevalence remains to be determined.

Cannabis is the most frequently used illicit drug worldwide (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, UNODC, 2013) and among US adolescents and young adults, with 45.2% of high school seniors reporting lifetime use in 2012 and 36.4% reporting use in the past 12 months (Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2013a). Cannabis use has fluctuated among US youth over the last few decades—lifetime prevalence among high school seniors peaked at 60.4% in 1979 and declined to 35.3% in 1993, and lifetime use recently surpassed 45% again in 2011 for the first time since 2004. In 2011, 2.6 million individuals (age 12 or older) in the US initiated cannabis use and the average age of initiation is 17.5 (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, SAMHSA, 2012), the most common age of US high school seniors (modal age: 18).

As prevalence of cannabis use has risen, the proportion of US high school seniors who disapprove of trying cannabis only once or twice has slowly declined from 58.6% in 2007 to 48.8% in 2012, while disapproval toward smoking cannabis regularly slowly dropped to 77.8% in 2012; this is the lowest rate of disapproval since 1981 (Johnston et al., 2013a). The proportion of high school seniors in favor of legalization has increased to the highest rate ever (39.3% in 2012) since Monitoring the Future (MTF) began assessing such attitudes in 1975; and of the proportion in favor of treating use as a minor violation have slightly decreased in recent years (e.g., 30% in 2008 to 26.8% in 2012) (Johnston et al., 2013a) as more students are now favoring full legalization. Moreover, perception of risk associated with using once or twice has also decreased to 14.8% (e.g., from 18.6% in 2007). However, the proportion who perceive cannabis as easy to access have remained relatively stable at about 82% (Johnston et al., 2013a).

While cannabis legalization would likely reduce rates of arrest and incarceration related to use, it is unknown whether legalization would be associated with higher rates of use, particularly among those at highest risk for use—adolescents approaching adulthood. There is a dearth of epidemiological data with regard to cannabis legalization; however, studies have begun to examine how various forms of decriminalization and depenalization relate to rates of use. Studies have found that overall, cannabis decriminalization or depenalization have generally not been associated with increased rates of use (Greenwald, 2009, Hughes and Stevens, 2010, MacCoun, 2010a, MacCoun and Reuter, 2011, Vuolo, 2013). However, results from some studies suggest temporary increases in prevalence of recent use in some subgroups after a form of decriminalization is implemented (e.g., Dutch coffee shop decriminalization) (Kilmer et al., 2010, MacCoun, 2010b). It is unknown whether similar policies would have comparable effects elsewhere (e.g., in more heterogeneous areas) (Kleiman, Caulkins, & Hawken, 2011). It is estimated that consumption would increase in the case of full legalization, in part, due to a drop in prices; however, taxation and regulations would likely help prevent increases in initiation (Caulkins et al., 2012, Kilmer et al., 2010). Recent epidemiological studies have also yielded mixed results regarding the associations between local medicinal cannabis policies and rates of use. While some research suggests that adolescent cannabis use is higher in states that allow medicinal cannabis (Wall et al., 2011), others suggest that higher use may precede such laws (Harper, Strumpf, & Kaufman, 2012).

Cannabis policy is rapidly evolving in some areas of the world and it is crucial to determine whether more liberal policies lead to increased incidence of cannabis use as well as problematic use. However, there is a lack of empirical data to examine the effects of such policies. In the absence of data to address these questions, we focus on surrogates for those outcomes: in the case of legalization, intentions to initiate use among non-users and intentions to use more among those who have already initiated use. Intentions are assumed to capture the motivational factors that may result in behaviors, and of all behavioral dispositions they are most closely linked to corresponding actions (Ajzen and Fishbein, 1980). For example, research suggests that intention to not smoke cigarettes is protective against smoking in national samples (Wakefield et al., 2004) and for this reason intention to smoke is often an important covariate and outcome for tobacco studies (Bauer, Johnson, Hopkins, & Brooks, 2000). So while there is a lack of data regarding how changes in policy affect use, intention to use in the case of legalization would serve as an important indicator of who may be at highest risk for initiation, continuation, or escalation of use if policies continue to shift.

Here we examine correlates of intention to use cannabis among US high school seniors if it were to become legalized. Examining intention to use cannabis among high school seniors would help delineate risk factors that could be targets of interventions and programs designed to prevent or delay use in an era of potential “normalization” of use.

Section snippets

Methods

Data were taken from MTF, an annual survey of high school students in approximately 130 public and private schools throughout 48 states in the US (Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2012). The MTF protocol was reviewed and approved by the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board. Schools were selected through a multi-stage random sampling procedure: geographic areas were selected, then schools within geographic areas, and then students within selected schools. Since MTF

Intention to use cannabis among non-lifetime cannabis users

Characteristics of the non-cannabis-using sample are presented in Table 1, stratified by survey year and also presented for all respondents collectively. The sample was 54.1% female and 60.0% white. With respect to substance use, 18.8% reported smoking cigarettes in their lifetime, the majority (71.8%) indicated that their friends disapproved or strongly disapproved of cannabis use, and 10.3% indicated they would try cannabis if legal to use and legally available. Student characteristics were

Discussion

Rates of cannabis use are increasing and attitudes toward use among adolescents and young adults are shifting, yet little is known about whether prevalence of use would increase substantially in light of legalization. Likewise, little is known about risk factors for initiation and continued use within the context of legalization. With an absence of data that would allow us to examine how prevalence changes in relation to enactment of more liberal cannabis laws, we utilized national survey data

Conflict of interest

No conflict declared.

Acknowledgements

This project was not funded. The National Institute on Drug Abuse, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, and Monitoring the Future principal investigators, had no role in analysis, interpretation of results, or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Monitoring the Future data were collected through a research grant (R01 DA-01411) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH). The content is solely the

References (47)

  • I. Azjen

    From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior

  • J.G. Bachman et al.

    Explaining recent increases in students’ marijuana use: Impacts of perceived risks and disapproval, 1976 through 1996

    American Journal of Public Health

    (1998)
  • U.E. Bauer et al.

    Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: Findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998–2000

    Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2000)
  • J.P. Caulkins et al.

    Cannabis legalization: What everyone needs to know

    (2012)
  • CIFRA

    La regulación del cultivo y consumo de marihuana y el impacto esperado en el narcotráfico [The regulation of the cultivation and consumption of marihuana and the hoped-for impact on drug trafficking]

    (2013)
  • A. Gelman et al.

    An analysis of the New York City Police Department's “Stop-and-Frisk” policy in the context of claims of racial bias

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (2007)
  • A. Golub et al.

    The race/ethnicity disparity in misdemeanor cannabis arrests in New York City

    Criminology & Public Policy

    (2007)
  • G. Greenwald

    Drug decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies

    (2009)
  • A. Hawken et al.

    Quasi-legal cannabis in Colorado and Washington: Local and national implications

    Addiction

    (2013)
  • J. Healy

    Voters ease cannabis laws in 2 states, but legal questions remain

    (2012, November 8)
  • S.G. Heeringa et al.

    Applied survey data analysis

    (2010)
  • C.E. Hughes et al.

    What can we learn from The Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs?

    British Journal of Criminology

    (2010)
  • J.L. Humensky

    Are adolescents with high socioeconomic status more likely to engage in alcohol and illicit drug use in early adulthood?

    Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention & Policy

    (2010)
  • Cited by (112)

    • Cannabis use among Norwegian university students: Gender differences, legalization support and use intentions, risk perceptions, and use disorder

      2021, Addictive Behaviors Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, there is no comparable coordinated effort when it comes to understanding legalization attitudes or intended use behaviors under legalization regimes, especially among young people. Limited research notes that, not surprisingly, those who support cannabis legalization also tend to be current and recent users themselves (Williams et al., 2016; Ellis et al., 2019), and that the intentions and/or expectations to use cannabis are increasingly common among adolescents and young adults, especially if recreational use were legal (Lopez-Quintero and Neumark, 2010; Palamar et al., 2014; Miech et al., 2015; Leung et al., 2020; Leal and Jackson, 2019). For example, sizable proportions of Australian adolescents (85%) and young adults (59%) who had never used cannabis expressed interest in trying or using cannabis in case of legalization (Leung et al., 2020).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text