Response
Using qualitative data, people's perceptions, and the science of decision making to inform policy and improve hepatitis C care for people who use drugs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2014.10.006Get rights and content

Section snippets

Conflicts of interest and grant support

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. This work was supported by National Institute on Drug Abuse P30 DA011041.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (25)

  • J.A. Hayden et al.

    Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (2006)
  • Institute for Government and the Cabinet Office. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy....
  • Cited by (4)

    • An international perspective on using opioid substitution treatment to improve hepatitis C prevention and care for people who inject drugs: Structural barriers and public health potential

      2015, International Journal of Drug Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Point of care HCV tests have the potential to allow widespread testing in OST settings where medical infrastructure is limited. Currently these tests are not routinely conducted or funded at OST programs, and since positive point of care tests require subsequent viral load testing and linkage to care, gaps in the HCV care are often introduced at these steps (Morano et al., 2014; Perlman & Jordan, 2015). Regardless of whether HCV testing is done on site or off site by effective linkage, its potential contribute to HCV control (through primary prevention and through enhancing TasP) would be enhanced by strategies to address identified barriers to, and to utilize identified facilitators of, HCV testing among PWID (Harris & Rhodes, 2013; Jordan et al., 2013; Lally, Montstream-Quas, Tanaka, Tedeschi, & Morrow, 2008).

    View full text