Research paperEstimating the production, consumption and export of cannabis: The Dutch case
Introduction
Up until the 1980s, the Netherlands was importing cannabis, mainly in the form of hashish, from countries such as Morocco, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Columbia and India. The majority of cannabis consumed in Europe originated from the Moroccan Rif Mountains and the border regions of Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran, where cultivation increased explosively since the 1960s to meet the growing European demand (Afsahi, 2011, Weijenburg, 1993). It wasn’t until the 1980s that cannabis cultivation emerged in the Netherlands and this ‘import substitution’ became a topic of particular interest to Dutch scholars.
The emergence and increase of the cultivation of cannabis in the Netherlands is attributed to several factors, including the development of new cultivation techniques and varieties of cannabis (Decorte and Boekhout van Solinge, 2006, Spapens et al., 2014), national and international efforts to counter the smuggling of hashish to the Netherlands (Korf, 2006), and the ‘tolerant’ Dutch attitude toward the sale of cannabis through coffee shops (Jansen, 1993, Fijnaut et al., 1998; Spapens et al., 2014). Consequently, the Netherlands has developed into a significant producer of cannabis over the past three decades (Korf, 2011, EMCDDA, 2013).
Though it is clear that the Netherlands has become a large-scale producer of cannabis, questions continuously arise as to the actual size of the illegal Dutch soft drug market, and how much of domestic production is exported. Estimates of the size of the domestic market and the export also play a central role in the current political debate pertaining to the regulation of the cultivation of cannabis for coffee shops in the Netherlands. The Minister of Security and Justice in part bases his decision to not allow the regulation of cannabis cultivation for Dutch coffee shops on export estimates, stating that if a lot of the cannabis cultivated in the Netherlands is intended for export, regulating the cultivation for Dutch coffee shops will only have a limited effect on the total cultivation. Furthermore, illegal cultivation would continue to exist and regulated cultivation would be ineffective in combatting organized crime related to the cultivation of cannabis (see for example Tweede Kamer, 2014a, Tweede Kamer, 2014b).
However, the information needed to quantify the cultivation, consumption, and export of Dutch cannabis is limited and uncertain due to the clandestine nature of illegal markets. This article presents findings from a recent estimate of the production, consumption and export of cannabis for the case of the Netherlands and discusses the opportunities provided by, and limitations of, mathematical models for estimating the illegal cannabis market (Van der Giessen, Van Ooyen-Houben, & Moolenaar, 2014).
Section snippets
Data collection
Because limited information is available on the Dutch cannabis market due to its clandestine nature, the models are data driven. Where data for a certain variable were not available, substituting in other variables or combinations of variables approximated the value. Unfortunately, this means that a fairly large number of variables are required for the estimates. To validate the data, we not only searched for the most recent data, we also assessed the uncertainty inherent in the data.
The
Data analysis
We recorded the lowest and the highest reported values we could find for each variable. With these, we calculate the lowest and the highest possible outcomes for the production, consumption and export models. These constitute the lower and upper bounds of our interval estimates. Furthermore, we perform a Monte-Carlo simulation (MC) by drawing 100,000 random values between the lowest and highest value of each input variable. This yields a range in which 95% of the estimates lie. This approach
Modelling the export of Dutch cannabis
The mathematical model to estimate the production, consumption, and export of cannabis developed by Jansen (2012) was used as a starting point and expanded upon with the models used in other state of the art, national and international estimates (Bouchard, 2008, Carpentier et al., 2012, Hakkarainen et al., 2011Kilmer and Pacula, 2009, Van der Heijden, 2006, Van Laar et al., 2013a, Van Laar et al., 2013b, Van Laar et al., 2013c, Van Laar et al., 2013d). This resulted in several alternative
Production
The annual production of Dutch cannabis is estimated to be between 171 and 965 tons depending on which model is used (see Fig. 1). This is a very wide range; the upper limit is roughly 5.6 times the lower limit. The width of the range is indicative of the great uncertainty inherent in available information. The MC simulation revealed that 95% of the estimates lie between 271 and 613 tons, depending on the model used.
Consumption
The annual consumption of Dutch cannabis in the Netherlands is estimated to be
Possibilities and limitations of the research
The availability and reliability of the data required for the cannabis production, consumption and export estimates proved to be limited and, as a consequence, we had to rely on many assumptions and inter/extrapolations. This uncertainty is reflected in the wide ranges of the estimates. The estimates were also limited at the model level; it was not possible to triangulate outcomes using only independent models as a number of variables – in particular the ones regarding electricity loss and
Acknowledgements
This work is based on a study performed at the request of the Dutch Minister of Security and Justice by the Scientific Research and Documentation Centre. A special thanks to P. Jans-Rat, J.A.F. Jespers, E.W. Kruisbergen, N. Maalsté, R.F. Meijer, A.W.M. van der Heijden, W. Vanhove and M. Wouters who have contributed to the data collection and have partaken in the expert panel to review and, where necessary, adjust variables. We are also grateful to the guidance committee, D. van de Mheen
References (91)
- et al.
The epidemiology of substance use and disorders among middle aged and elderly community adults: national survey on drug use and health (NSDUH)
American Journal for Geriatric Psychiatry
(2009) Validating self-reports of illegal drug use to evaluate National Drug Control Policy: A reanalysis and critique
Evaluation and Program Planning
(2010)- et al.
Predicting the transition from frequent cannabis use to cannabis dependence: A three-year prospective study
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2013) - et al.
Onderzoek naar de methodologie voor de verdeling van de kosten van netverliezen
(2011) Factsheet Kwaliteit 2013. Regionale Netbeheerders, Elektriciteitsnetten & Gastransportnetten
(2013)Marijuana indoor growing
(2007)Cannabis cultivation practices in the Moroccan Rif
Kerncijfers Amsterdam als congresbestemming
(2014)Amsterdam Bezoekersprofiel: Amsterdam Visitors Survey 2012
(2012)- et al.
De illegale gebruikersmarkt
Coffeeshopbezoekers in Venlo 2009. Tellingen en enquête coffeeshopbezoekers Venlo
Wederrechtelijk verkregen voordeel hennepkwekerij bij binnenteelt onder kunstlicht. Standaardberekening en normen
Wederrechtelijk verkregen voordeel hennepkwekerij bij binnenteelt onder kunstlicht. Standaardberekening en normen. Update 1 November, 2010
A capture–recapture derived method to estimate cannabis production in industrialized countries
Toward a realistic method to estimate cannabis production in industrialized countries
Contemporary Drug Problems
Marijuana horticulture. The indoor/outdoor medical grower's bible
Ervaren coffeeshopgerelateerde overlast in Maastricht & coffeeshopbezoek in Maastricht, Heerlen, Kerkrade en Sittard-Geleen. Gebundelde resultaten nulmeting 2011
Small scale domestic cannabis cultivation: An anonymous web survey among 659 cannabis cultivators in Belgium
Het aanbod van cannabis in Nederland en België
Tijdschrift voor Criminologie
Cannabisteelt in Vlaanderen. Patronen en motieven van 748 telers
Convenant districtelijke aanpak hennepkwekerijen. Resultaten 2009–2011
Beleidsdoorlichting Domeinen Roerende Zaken
Performance management, indicators and drug enforcement, in the crossfire or at the crossroads?
A cannabis reader: Global issues and local experiences. Perspectives on cannabis controversies, treatment and regulation in Europe. EMCDDA Monographs 8(1)
Cannabis production and markets in Europe. EMCDDA Insights 12
Case study 1. Cannabis: Changing demand and an increase in domestic production
New developments in Europe's cannabis market. Perspectives on drugs
Het groene goud. Verslag van een onderzoek naar de cannabissector voor het Nationaal dreigingsbeeld criminaliteit met een georganiseerd karakter
The utility of drug testing in epidemiological research: Results from a general population survey
Addiction
Een drugsbeleid in de revisie: een nuchtere kijk op de Hollandse coffeeshop
Organized crime in the Netherlands
Voor een gezamenlijke beheersing van de drugsgerelateerde criminaliteit in de Euregio Maas-Rijn
The Cannabis Grow Bible. The definitive guide to growing marijuana for recreational and medicinal use
Small-scale cannabis growing in Denmark and Finland
European Addiction Research
Afhandeling van in beslag genomen drugs. Fase 1 – Randvoorwaarden voor verbetering
Hasj-coffee shops als experiment
Justitiële Verkenningen
Criminaliteitsbeeldanalyse 2012: Georganiseerde cannabisteelt
Middelengebruik bij jongens in Justitiële Jeugdinrichtingen. Het gebruik van tabak, alcohol, cannabis en harddrugs bij jongens met en zonder PIJ-maatregel
Estimating the size of the global drug market. A demand-side approach. Report 2
Hennepkwekerijen 2013
De normalisering van cannabisgebruik
Justitiële Verkenningen
Marihuana behind and beyond coffee shops
De illegale gebruikersmarkt
De illegale gebruikersmarkt van cannabis
Cited by (4)
Triangulating web & general population surveys: Do results match legal cannabis market sales?
2019, International Journal of Drug PolicyCitation Excerpt :The first, sometimes referred to as “demand-side estimates”, starts with estimates of numbers of users (e.g., Wilkins, Bhatta, & Casswell, 2002; Legleye et al., 2008; Kilmer et al., 2013; van Laar et al., 2013; Giommoni, 2014). The second starts with measures pertaining to supply, such as acreage under cultivation (e.g., Bouchard, 2008; Kalacska & Bouchard, 2011; van der Giessen, van Ooyen-Houben, & Moolenaar, 2016). Since the supply-side estimates were so strong, being rooted in Washington’s regulatory tracking system, contrasting them shed some light on the effectiveness of efforts to combine GPS and web-based surveys.
Advancing the science, methods and practices of drug policy research
2016, International Journal of Drug PolicyA digital twin reference architecture for pharmaceutical cannabis production
2023, International Journal of Computer Integrated ManufacturingThe legalization of cannabis: An American experiment with global consequences
2018, Revista Espanola de Drogodependencias